Can you refuse to be a witness according to Indian Law?


 


According to Indian law, no one has the right to refuse to appear in court as a witness and in a court of law, one must tell the truth.

On the 17th of March 2015, the Hon'ble Supreme Court issued a verdict in the case of Nisha Jain vs State. If a witness is asked a question that is relevant to the issues at hand, he does not have the right to refuse to answer. To put it another way, there is a legal obligation to respond.

The reluctance to testify is considered a form of contempt of court. However, even contempt of court is considered quasi-criminal, which implies that a person is entitled to some constitutional procedures.

In accordance with Indian Law, no one may decline to appear in court as a witness. In a court of law, the truth must be told. The best advocate in Delhi stated these facts.

When witnesses refuse to come back in a criminal case :

Section 87 CrPC :

Issue of warrant instead of, or additionally to summons — A Court may, in any case in which it is empowered by this Code to issue a summons for the appearance of someone, issue a warrant for his arrest after recording its reasons in writing—a) if, either before the problem of such summons or after the problem of the identical but before the time fixed for his appearance, the Court sees reason to believe that he has absconded or will not obey the summons; or b) if at such time he fails to appear and the summons is

Section 350 CrPc :

Summary Procedure for Punishment for non-attendance by a witness in obedience to a summons

1. If a witness summoned to appear before a tribunal is legally required to appear at a specific place and time in obedience to the summons and without good reason neglects or refuses to appear at that place or time, or departs from the place where he needs to attend before the time at which it is lawful for him to depart, and the Court before which the witness is to appear is satisfied that it is expedient in the interests of justice that such a witness sh should be dismissed, the Court may take cognizance of the offence and after giving the offender a chance of showing cause why he shouldn't be punished under this section, sentence him to fine not exceeding 100 rupees.

2. In such situation, the Court will follow the procedure specified for summary trials as closely as possible.

When a witness refuses to return in a civil case :

Rule 10. Procedure whose witness fails to fits summons.

(1) If an individual to whom a summons has been issued fails to appear, relinquish evidence, or provide a document in accordance with the summons, the Court- (a) shall, if the certificate of the serving officer has not been verified by affidavit, or if service of the summons has been affected by a celebration or his agent, or (b) may, if the certificate of the serving officer has been so verified, examine on oath the individual.

(2) Where the Court has reason to believe that such evidence or production is material, and such person has failed to attend or supply the document in accordance with such summons or has purposefully avoided service, the Court will issue a proclamation requiring him to attend to provide evidence or to supply the document at a time and place to be named therein, and a copy of such proclamation will be affixed on the outer door or other conspicuous location.

 (3) visible of or at the time of issuing such proclamation, or at any time thereafter, the Court may, in its discretion, issue a warrant for the arrest of such person, either with or without bail, and will make an order for the attachment of his property to such amount as it thinks fit, not exceeding the number of the prices of attachment and any fine that can be imposed under rule 12: on condition that no Court of Small Causes shall make an order for the attachment of his property.

Rule 12. Procedure if a witness fails to seem.

(1)   Where such person fails to appear, or appears but fails to satisfy the Court, the Court may impose on him any fine not exceeding five hundred rupees that it deems appropriate, having regard to his state of life and all the circumstances of the case, and should order his property, or any part thereof, to be attached and sold or, if already attached under rule 10, to be sold for the purpose of satisfying all costs of such attachment, together with the quantity of such attachment.

(2)   If the person whose appearance is required pays the aforementioned prices and fines into Court, the Court will release the property from attachment.

 

(3)    Despite the fact that the Court has not made a proclamation pursuant to Rule 10 sub-rule (2), nor has it issued a warrant or ordered attachment pursuant to Rule 10 sub-rule (1),

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What are the basic rights of a consumer under the consumer protection laws in India?

Image
In 1986, the Consumer Protection Act was enacted to defend consumers' fundamental rights. The act was later updated in 2002 in order to make it more efficient in today's world. The major goal of enacting the consumer protection law is to defend the consumer's fundamental rights and to build a robust legal authority to handle all consumer issues. The best consumer protection advocate in Delhi explains the consumer protection law and how to use it to seek remedy for any unfair business practices or to educate consumers about their basic rights. Before we can learn about a consumer's basic rights, we must first understand who a consumer is under the law. According to the legislation , a consumer is defined as a person who purchases goods or services for personal use rather than resale, or who uses the products or services with the buyer's approval. The statute applies to all commodities and services from a variety of industries, including ecommerce, electricit...
Read more

Whether a magistrate can stop an investigation by police?

Image
  If the police fail to do their job in a cognizable offence, the magistrate has the authority to order an investigation. A magistrate may either instruct the police officer to investigate the matter or substitute a magisterial inquiry conducted by himself or his deputies. However, the question is whether a magistrate also has the power to stop an investigation by police or not? To further comprehend this, the best lawyer in Delhi refers to two Supreme Court cases. The Lahore high court ruled in Crown v. Mohammad Sadiq Niaz that the magistrate has no authority to compel the investigation to be halted. It does not fall under their jurisdiction power. In another case, S.N. Sharma v. Bipen Kumar Tiwari , the court held that section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. can only empower a magistrate to order an investigation if the police had opted not to investigate the case. And there is no further reference in the clause that a magistrate can also order a police inquiry to be halte...
Read more